Tuesday, January 14, 2025
By: The High Priest King
In the United States, we often celebrate our liberties as “God-given” and guaranteed by the Constitution—one of the most revered governing documents in the world. Yet many are unaware of certain critical details about how, from the very moment of birth, a potential conflict emerges between natural sovereignty and a state-managed system of paperwork. This post seeks to shed light on these important issues, addressing how birth certificates and Social Security numbers may bind us to corporate frameworks, and what that might mean for our freedoms. While the discussion is complex, I present these facts as they are known and trust that our moral compass, grounded in justice, truth, love, and constitutional principles, can guide us toward a better understanding.
Imagine you have a brand-new baby brother or sister. When a baby is born in a hospital, grown-ups usually sign a paper called a “Birth Certificate.” The government and hospitals trick moms and dads into signing this “birth certificate” instead of a “Certificate of Live Birth.” Why does this matter?
Well, if you sign the birth certificate, the government treats the baby like a company instead of a real, living person. The baby’s name is then written in big capital letters (LIKE THIS), and the baby is given a special number called a Social Security number. All of this is done through the States Corporation, which differs from the actual state. For example, The State of New York is the state where sovereign entities reside, but the Corporate Entity of the State is named NEW YORK STATE. All “citizens” follow rules and regulations made by NEW YORK STATE, whereas sovereign entities are free to say “no, thank you” and continue living under the laws of the Constitution.
This means the baby is never classified as a sovereign being with freedom, and instead grows up being told what to do and having to abide by a set of rules and regulations implemented through various organizations and corporations—not under the laws of the Constitution. Considering the government and hospitals fail to inform mothers of this when a baby is born, it is seen as a breach of trust between the government and its people. Police and special courts (called administrative courts) might punish people for breaking these “company” rules, even if the person believes they shouldn’t follow them because they are a real, living person with natural rights and choose to live under God’s Law, also known as the Constitution of the United States.
Some grown-ups say this isn’t fair or honest. They think everyone should be seen as a living, breathing soul with rights and freedoms, and that no one should be treated like a company or a number. They also worry that moms and dads don’t know the difference between a “Birth Certificate” and a “Certificate of Live Birth,” and that the United Kingdom owns and operates the corporations for each state—doing this on purpose as a way to control the masses and take away the freedoms for which our forefathers fought and died.
In the end, we the people want the government to tell the truth and respect each person’s freedom. We the People believe we should all live under the Constitution (which protects our rights), not a bunch of confusing rules for pretend “companies.” That way, everyone—especially new babies—can grow up as free and happy as possible, just as our forefathers originally intended: to live in one nation under God.
Why It Matters: If we believe in the inalienable rights granted to individuals by the Constitution, any system that reduces a person’s essence to a mere administrative or corporate form seems to contradict the fundamental truths of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Recognizing that a newborn is—and always has been—a living soul upholds the constitutional principle of each individual’s inherent dignity and rights.
Moral Standpoint: From a moral perspective, it’s essential that any system of governance be built on honesty and transparent consent. Children—who obviously cannot consent—should at least have the option to confirm or reject such a status upon reaching adulthood.
In Search of Justice: If our core principle is that no one should lose their constitutional rights arbitrarily, then ensuring that courts distinguish between natural persons and corporate entities is a moral imperative. A transparent judicial system respects each individual’s unalienable rights, as safeguarded by the Constitution.
A Perspective Rooted in Love: The best law enforcement agencies operate first to protect the people—ensuring that no harm befalls our communities. Aligning police practices with love, compassion, and respect for fundamental rights ensures that the system remains just, not oppressive.
Moral Imperative: Standing for truth means ensuring that any laws, codes, or statutes remain subservient to the higher principles of our Constitution. It’s morally critical that we remain ever-vigilant to ensure no unseen mechanisms deprive us of our birthright.
Considering the facts, the moral and constitutional arguments in favor of sovereignty, transparency, and loving governance remain compelling. Whether one is new to these ideas or deeply involved in them, here are a few suggestions for moving ahead:
At the heart of this conversation lies a profound reverence for truth, justice, love, and the Constitution of the United States. The facts, as presented, suggest that when a child is born, there may be a profound transformation—one that transitions the new life from a sovereign soul to a government-recognized entity, subject to statutory authority through birth certificates, Social Security numbers, and administrative courts.
From a moral perspective, any system that withholds full disclosure or imposes obligations without genuine consent stands at odds with the ideals of liberty and transparency. As Americans (and as human beings), many believe we are called to live under the guidance of constitutional values—values that recognize our divine spark, our innate sovereignty, and our duty to treat others with love and respect.
Ultimately, this topic calls us to vigilance: to ensure that our birthright as free beings under the Constitution is honored and that government structures operate as faithful stewards of our sacred liberties, rather than as gatekeepers who keep us from them. It is both a challenge and an opportunity to uphold the true spirit of the Constitution in our daily lives, and to do so rooted in unshakeable commitment to justice, truth, and love.
Do not Fear, someone greater than Solomon is here.
Truth, Light, Love, Free Will